AoPSWiki
Trying to make National MATHCOUNTS next year? Our Advanced MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 course can help you prepare. Click here to enroll today!
Personal tools

Sylow Theorems

From AoPSWiki

The Sylow theorems are a collection of results in the theory of finite groups. They give a partial converse to Lagrange's Theorem, and are one of the most important results in the field. They are named for P. Ludwig Sylow, who published their proof in 1872.

The Theorems

Throughout this article, p will be an arbitrary prime.

The three Sylow theorems are as follows:

Theorem. Every finite group contains a Sylow p-subgroup.
Theorem. In every finite group, the Sylow p-subgroups are conjugates.
Theorem. In every finite group, the number of Sylow p-subgroups is equivalent to 1 (mod p).

As 0\neq 1 \pmod{p}, the third theorem implies the first.

Before proving the third theorem, we show some preliminary results.

Lemma 1. Let r and m be nonnegative integers. Then \binom{p^r m}{p^r} \equiv m \pmod{p} .

Proof. Let G be a group of order p^r (e.g., \mathbb{Z}/p^r\mathbb{Z}, and let S be a set of size m. Let G act on the set G \times T by the law g(\alpha, x) \mapsto (g\alpha, x); extend this action canonically to the subsets of G \times S of size p^r. There are \binom{p^r m}{p^r} such subsets.

Evidently, a subset of A \times T is stable under this action if and only if A= G. Thus the fixed points of the action are exactly the subsets of the form G \times \{x\}, for x\in S. Then there are m fixed points. Therefore \binom{p^r m}{p^r} \equiv m, since the p-group G operates on a set of size \binom{p^r m}{p^r} with m fixed points. \blacksquare

Let G be a finite group, and let its order be n= p^r m, for some integer m not divisible by p.

Lemma 2. Let \mathfrak{P} be the set of subsets of G of size p^r, and let G act on \mathfrak{P} by left translation. Suppose \mathfrak{H} is an orbit of \mathfrak{P} such that p does not divide \lvert \mathfrak{H} \rvert. Then \mathfrak{H} has m elements, and they are disjoint.

Proof. Since \lvert \mathfrak{H} \rvert divides n = p^r m but is relatively prime to p^r, it follows that \lvert \mathfrak{H} \rvert divides m; in particular, \lvert \mathfrak{H} \rvert \le m. Since every element of G is included in some element of \mathfrak{H}, \lvert G \rvert = \biggl\lvert \bigcup_{H \in \mathfrak{H}} H \biggr\rvert \le \lvert \mathfrak{H} \rvert \cdot p^r \le m \cd... with equality only when the elements of \mathfrak{H} are disjoint and when \mathfrak{H}=m. Since equality does occur, both these conditions must be true. \blacksquare

Theorem 3. The number of finite subgroups of G is equivalent to 1 (mod p).

Proof. Consider the action of G on \mathfrak{P}, as described in Lemma 2. Since \binom{n}{p} \equiv m \pmod{p}, and every orbit \mathfrak{H} of \mathfrak{P} for which p does not divide \lvert \mathfrak{H} \rvert has m elements, it follows that the number of such orbits is equivalent to 1 (mod p). It thus suffices to show that every such orbit contains exactly one Sylow p-subgroup, and that every Sylow p-subgroup is contained in exactly one such orbit.

To this end, let \mathfrak{H} be an orbit of \mathfrak{P} for which p does not divide \mathfrak{H}. Consider the equivalence relation R(x,y) on elements of G, defined as "x and y are in the same element of \mathfrak{H}". Then R is compatible with left translation by G; since the elements of \mathfrak{H} are disjoint, R is an equivalence relation. Thus the equivalence class of the identity is a subgroup H of G, which must have order p^r. Since this is the only element of \mathfrak{H} that contains the identity, it is the only group in \mathfrak{H}.

Conversely, if H is a Sylow p-subgroup, then its orbit is its set of left cosets, which has size m, which p does not divide. Since orbits are disjoint, H is contained in exactly one orbit of \mathfrak{P}. \blacksquare

We now prove a more general theorem that implies the second Sylow theorem.

Theorem 4. Let H be a Sylow p-subgroup of G, and let K be a p-subgroup of G. Then K is a subgroup of some conjugate of H.

Proof. Consider the left operation of K on G/H, the set of left cosets of G modulo H. Since the order of K is some power of p, say p^s, the size of each orbit must divide p^s; since there are m cosets, and p \nmid m, it follows that some orbit must have size 1, i.e., there must be some g\in G such that gH is stable under the operation by K. Then for all k \in K, g^{-1}kgH = g^{-1}gH = H, i.e., g^{-1}kg stabilizes H. Thus g^{-1}kg \in H. It follows that g^{-1}Kg \subseteq H, or K\subseteq gHg^{-1}. \blacksquare

Corollary 5 (second Sylow theorem). The Sylow p-subgroups of G are conjugates.

Corollary 6. Every subgroup of G that is a p-group is contained in a Sylow p-subgroup of G.

Corollary 7. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G, let N be its normalizer, and let M be a subgroup of G that contains M. Then M is its own normalizer.

Proof. Let g be an element of G such that gMg^{-1} \subseteq M. Then gPg^{-1} is a Sylow p-subgroup of M. Since the Sylow p-subgroups of M are conjugates, there exists m\in M such that mPm^{-1} = gPg^{-1}. It follows that g^{-1}m normalizes P, so g^{-1}m \in N \subseteq M. Hence g\in M. Thus the normalizer of M is a subset of M. Since the opposite is true in general, M is its own normalizer. \blacksquare

Corollary 8. Let G_1 and G_2 be finite groups, and f a homomorphism of G_1 into G_2. Let P_1 be a Sylow p-subgroup of G_1. Then there exists a Sylow p-subgroup P_2 of G_2 such that f(P_1) \subseteq P_2.

For f(P_1) is a p-subgroup of G_2; this corollary then follows from Corollary 6.

Corollary 9. Let H be as subgroup of G and let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of H. Then there exists a Sylow p-subgroup P' of G such that P = H \cap P'.

Proof. There must be some Sylow p-subgroup P' of H that contains P. Since P' \cap H is a p-subgroup of H, it can be no larger than P. \blacksquare

Corollary 10. Conversely, if P' is a Sylow p-subgroup of G and H is a normal subgroup of G, then H \cap P' is a Sylow p-subgroup of H.

Proof. Let s be the greatest integer such that p^s divides the order of H. Let \phi be the canonical homomorphism from G to G/H. Then H \cap P' is the kernel of the restriction of \phi to P'. Since P'/(H \cap P') is isomorphic to P'/H, a p-subgroup of G/H of order not exceeding p^{r-s}, it follows from Lagrange's Theorem that H \cap P' has order at least p^s. Thus p \nmid (H : H\cap P'); since H\cap P' is a p-subgroup of H, it follows that it is a Sylow p-subgroup of H. \blacksquare

Note that this is not true in general if H is not normal. For instance \{e, (12) \} is a Sylow 2-subgroup of the symmetric group S_3 and \{e,(23)\} is a subgroup of S_3, but their intersection, \{e\}, is evidently not a Sylow 2-subgroup of \{e,(23)\}.

Corollary 11. Let N be a normal subgroup of G, let \phi : G \to G/N be the canonical homomorphism. Then the image of every Sylow p-subgroup of G under \phi is a Sylow p-subgroup of G/N; furthermore, every Sylow p-subgroup of G/N is the image of a Sylow p-subgroup of G under \phi.

Proof. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G; let the order of N be p^sa, where a is a positive integer not divisible by p. By Corollary 9, P \cap N is a group of order p^s; it follows that \phi(P) is isomorphic to P/(P \cap N), a group of order p^{r-s}, so \phi(P) is a Sylow p-subgroup of G/N. Now, let P' be a Sylow p-subgroup of G/N; then there exists \alpha \in G/N such that P' = \alpha^{-1} \cdot \phi(P) \alpha. Let a \in G be such that \phi(a) = \alpha; then P' = \phi(a^{-1} P a). \blacksquare

See also

Trying to get to the USAMO in 2010? Our AIME Problem Series can help you get there! Click here to enroll today!
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us