AoPSWiki
Our Precalculus course starts on Dec. 4. Master trig, complex numbers, and vectors and matrices in 2 and 3 dimensions. Click here to enroll today!
Personal tools

Coset

From AoPSWiki

A coset is a subset of a group.

Specifically, let G be a group, and let H be a subgroup of G. The left cosets modulo H are the subsets of G of the form aH, for a\in G. Note that for any coset aH, the mapping x \mapsto ax is a bijection from H to aH. Hence for any a\in G, |aH| = |H| = |Ha|.

The image of a left coset aH under the mapping x \mapsto x^{-1} is the right coset Hx^{-1}. This mapping induces a bijection from the set of left cosets of H to the set of right cosets of H.

The cardinality of the set of left cosets of H is called the index of H with respect to G; it is denoted (G:H). This is also the cardinality of the set of right cosets of H.

Proposition. The relations x^{-1}y \in H, xy^{-1} \in H are equivalence relations.

Proof. We prove that the first relation is an equivalence relation; the second then follows by passing to the opposite law on G.

We abbreviate x^{-1}y \in H as R(x,y). For any x, note that x^{-1}x \in H, so R(x,x). If x^{-1}y \in H, then y^{-1}x = (x^{-1}y)^{-1} \in H, so R(x,y) implies R(y,x). Finally, if x^{-1}y \in H and y^{-1}z \in H, then x^{-1}z = (x^{-1}y)(y^{-1}z) \in H; hence R(x,y) and R(y,z) together imply R(x,z). Hence R(x,y) is an equivalence relation. \blacksquare

Cosets and compatible relations

We call a relation R(x,y) left compatible with the group structure of G if x \equiv y \pmod{R} implies zx \equiv zy \pmod{R}, for all z\in G. Similarly, we say R is right compatible with the group structure of G if x \equiv y \pmod{R} implies xz \equiv yz \pmod{R}. Note that R is compatible with the group law on G if and only if it is both left- and right-compatible with the structure.

Theorem. An equivalence relation R(x,y) on a group G is left (resp. right) compatible with G if and only if it is of the form x^{-1}y \in H (resp. y^{-1}x \in H), for some subgroup H of G. In this case, H is the equivalence class of e, the identity, and the equivalence classes are the left (resp. right) cosets of H.

Proof. We will consider only the case for R(x,y) left compatible with G; the other case follows from symmetry.

Let H be the equivalence class of e. Note that x \equiv y \pmod{R} if and only if e \equiv x^{-1}x \equiv x^{-1}y \pmod{R}, which is true if and only if x^{-1}y \in H. It thus remains to show that H is a subgroup of G.

To this end, we note that evidently e\in H; also, if x\in H, then (x^{-1})^{-1}x = x^2 \equiv xe \pmod{R}, so x^{-1} \in H. Finally, if x,y are in H, then xy \equiv xe \in H. Thus H is a subgroup of G.

Conversely, suppose H is a subgroup of G, and define R(x,y) as x^{-1}y \in H. We have proven that R(x,y) is an equivalence relation; evidently e\equiv x \pmod{R} if and only if x = e^{-1}x \in H. Now, if x \equiv y \pmod{R}, then (zx)^{-1}(zy) = x^{-1}z^{-1}zy = x^{-1}y \in H, so R(x,y) is left-compatible with the group structure of G.

Now, x^{-1}y \in H if and only if y \in xH;. Hence the set of y equivalent to x (mod R) is the set xH. Thus the equivalence classes of R are the left cosets mod H. \blacksquare

See also

Our Precalculus course starts on Dec. 4. Master trig, complex numbers, and vectors and matrices in 2 and 3 dimensions. Click here to enroll today!
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us