AoPSWiki
Math Zoom Summer Program in Sunny Los Angeles: World renowned coaches and proven curricula. Learn problem-solving, expand math horizons, win in math contests. Make friends and have fun!
Sponsored Ad
Personal tools

Brun's constant

From AoPSWiki

Contents

Definition

Brun's constant is the (possibly infinite) sum of reciprocals of the twin primes \frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{11}+\frac{1}{13}+\frac{1}{17}+\frac{1}{19}+\cdots. It turns out that this sum is actually convergent. Brun's constant is equal to approximately 1.90216058.

Proof of convergence

Everywhere below, p will stand for an odd prime number. Let \pi_2(x)=\#\{p\le x:p+2\mathrm{\ is\ also\ prime\,}\}. We shall prove that \pi_2(x)\le C\frac{x}{(\ln x)^2}(\ln\ln x)^2 for large x with some absolute constant C<+\infty. The technique used in the proof is a version of the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion and is known nowadays as Brun's simple pure sieve.

Lemma

Let a_1,\dots,a_n\in[0,1]. Let \sigma_k=\sum_{1\le i_1<\dots<i_k\le n}a_{i_1}\dots a_{i_k} be the k-th symmetric sum of the numbers a_1,\dots, a_n. Then 1-\sigma_1+\sigma_2-\dots-\sigma_k\le \prod_{j=1}^n(1-a_j)\le 1-\sigma_1+\sigma_2-\dots+\sigma_\ell for every odd k and even \ell.

Proof of Lemma

Induction on n.


Now, take a very big x and fix some y\le x to be chosen later. For each odd prime p\le y, let

A_p=\{n\le x:p\mid n\mathrm{\ or\ }p\mid n+2\}.

Clearly, if n>y, and n\in A_p for some p\le y, then either n or n+2 is not prime. Thus, the number of primes q\le x such that q+2 is also prime does not exceed y+\left(x-\left|\bigcup_{p\le y}A_p\right|\right).

Let now \ell be an even number. By the inclusion-exclusion principle,

\left|\bigcup_{p\le y}A_p\right|\ge\sum_{p\le y}|A_p|-\sum_{p_1<p_2\le y}|A_{p_1}\cap A_{p_2}|+\sum_{p_1<p_2<p_3\le ...

Let us now estimate |A_{p_1}\cap\dots\cap A_{p_j}|. Note that the condition n\in A_{p_1}\cap\dots\cap A_{p_j} depends only on the remainder of n modulo p_1\cdot\dots\cdot p_j and that, by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there are exactly 2^j remainders that satisfy this condition (for each p_i\,, we must have n\equiv 0\mod p_i or n\equiv -2\mod p_i and the remainders for different p_i\, can be chosen independently). Therefore

|A_{p_1}\cap\dots\cap A_{p_j}|=\frac{2^j x}{p_1\cdot\dots\cdot p_j}+R(p_1,\dots,p_j)

where |R(p_1,\dots,p_j)|\le 2^j. It follows that

x-\left|\bigcup_{p\le y}A_p\right|\le x(1-\sigma_1+\sigma_2-\dots+\sigma_\ell)+y^{\ell}

where \sigma_k is the k-th symmetric sum of the set \left\{\frac 2p:p\le y\right\}. Indeed, we have not more than \left(\frac y2\right)^\ell terms in the inclusion-exclusion formula above and each term is estimated with an error not greater than 2^\ell.

Now notice that 1-\sigma_1+\sigma_2-\dots+\sigma_\ell=(1-\sigma_1+\sigma_2-\dots-\sigma_{\ell-1})+\sigma_\ell\le\prod_{p\le y}\left(1-\frac 2... by the lemma. The product does not exceed \prod_{p\le y}\left(1-\frac 1p\right)^2\le\frac {C}{(\ln y)^2} (see the prime number article), so it remains to estimate \sigma_\ell. But we have

\sigma_\ell\le \frac{1}{\ell!}\left(\sum_{p\le y}\frac 2p\right)^\ell\le\frac 1{\ell!}(2e\ln\ln y)^\ell\le\left(\frac{2e^2\ln....

This estimate yields the final inequality

\pi_2(x)\le y+ x\left[\frac C{(\ln y)^2}+\left(\frac {2e^2\ln\ln x}{\ell}\right)^\ell\right]+y^\ell.

It remains to minimize the right hand side over all possible choices of y and \ell. We shall choose \ell\approx 4e^2\ln\ln x and y=x^{\frac 1{100\ln\ln x}}. With this choice, every term on the right does not exceed C\frac{x}{(\ln x)^2}(\ln\ln x)^2 and we are done.

Want to learn how to tackle those tough AMC/AIME/Olympiad counting and probability problems? Check out Art of Problem Solving's Intermediate Counting & Probability by David Patrick.
© Copyright 2008 AoPS Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. • FoundationPrivacyContact Us